Title: Why does Kang Ziren hate childlike innocence?
Introduction
Recently, the conflict between Kang Ziren and Tongxin has become a hot topic on the Internet. The two used to be close partners, but recently Kang Ziren has publicly expressed his dissatisfaction with childlike innocence many times, triggering widespread speculation. This article will use structured data to sort out the background of the incident, the focus of conflicts and the opinions of netizens, and conduct an in-depth analysis of the reasons why Kang Ziren hates childlike innocence.
| time | event | heat index |
|---|---|---|
| 10 days ago | Kang Ziren secretly satirized the "hypocrisy" of childlike innocence during the live broadcast | 850,000 |
| 8 days ago | The Tongxin team responded that “differences in cooperation are normal” | 620,000 |
| 5 days ago | Kang Ziren issued a long article accusing Tongxin of breach of contract | 1.2 million |
| 3 days ago | Netizens revealed the inside story of their old collaboration | 980,000 |
| 1 day ago | Fans from both sides quarreled with each other on social media | 1.5 million |
1. Origin of contradictions: uneven distribution of interests
According to public information, Kang Ziren and Tong Xin once co-founded a certain brand, but later they had differences over equity distribution issues. Kang Ziren mentioned in the long article: "Childlike innocence takes advantage of his position to monopolize resources, resulting in the compression of the income I deserve." The following is a comparison of key data:
| Project | Kang Ziren advocated | childlike response |
|---|---|---|
| Equity ratio | Should account for 40% | "The initial agreement is 30%" |
| Dividend amount | Shortage of NT$2 million | "Paid as per contract" |
| Brand control | Being ignored | “Operational decisions are made jointly by the team” |
2. Emotional entanglement: from allies to rivals
Netizens revealed that the conflict between the two is not limited to the business level. Tongxin mentioned Kang Ziren's "paranoid personality" in an interview, while Kang Ziren accused Tongxin of "betraying trust" and hinted that he secretly poached core team members. The key timeline of the emotional rift is as follows:
| stage | relationship status | landmark event |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | honeymoon period | Attend press conferences together and interact frequently |
| 2022 | cool period | Social media interaction reduced by 50% |
| 2023 | period of hostility | Kang Ziren publicly removed the account of Guan Tongxin |
3. The direction of public opinion: Netizens are divided into different sides
After the incident broke out, supporters of both sides held different opinions. Polling on a certain platform showed that 45% of netizens believed that Kang Ziren had "suffered injustice", 32% believed that he was "hyping up the popularity", and the remaining 23% were neutral. Popular comment keywords include:
| Supporters | high frequency words | Proportion |
|---|---|---|
| Kang Ziren | "Rights Protection" and "Integrity" | 58% |
| childlike innocence | “Pattern” and “Tolerance” | 42% |
Conclusion: The complex truth behind hate
Taken together, Kang Ziren's hatred for childlike innocence is the result of the combined effect of commercial interests, personal emotions and pressure from public opinion. The conflict also reflects the common problem of unclear definition of rights and responsibilities in partnerships. At present, neither party has disclosed its intention to reconcile, and the subsequent development of the incident remains to be seen.
(The full text is about 850 words in total)
check the details
check the details
en
